The debate never ended. Many able men and women -- heroes, great thinkers, all -- on both sides have fallen, without a solution in sight. Who would win in a fight between the songs, Jumma Chumma De De from Hum and Tamma Tamma Loge from Thanedaar?
In case you were either a Mooninite up until last night, or just too young to know what I'm talking about: in 1990-91, Indians were in possession of a copy of Akwaba Beach, an album by Guinea native Mory Kanté. At least three of the album's tracks were featured in Bollywood movies over the next few years. Yé Ké Yé Ké was played in Agneepath during Amitabh's character's visit to Mauritius, and the intro to Inch'Allah became the "inspiration" for the chorus to the title song in Amitabh's Hum (1990-91). The track that had the most done to it, however, was Tama -- it "inspired" two songs featured in two different Hindi films. Ignoring the fact that they had both ripped off the same song, the Laxmikant-Pyarelal (hereafter LP) camp and the Bappi Lahiri camp began the finger-pointing, each accusing the other of having stolen original music from them. LP's version was intended for the Amitabh comeback vehicle Hum (1990-91), and Bappida's track for the Sanjay Dutt starrer Thanedaar (1990). Although the movies were scheduled for release within months of each other, Thanedaar didn't actually hit the box office until much later (1992) because of release date issues complicated by Sanjay Dutt's alleged role as supporting actor in some shady deals with the Bombay underworld. The makers of Hum assumed this resolved the controversy in their favour. With enough time having passed since then, I believe we can revisit the problem without letting our judgment be clouded by all the ancillary details.
In this post, I carefully analyze both songs as well as their accompanying videos before I present my verdict.
In case you were either a Mooninite up until last night, or just too young to know what I'm talking about: in 1990-91, Indians were in possession of a copy of Akwaba Beach, an album by Guinea native Mory Kanté. At least three of the album's tracks were featured in Bollywood movies over the next few years. Yé Ké Yé Ké was played in Agneepath during Amitabh's character's visit to Mauritius, and the intro to Inch'Allah became the "inspiration" for the chorus to the title song in Amitabh's Hum (1990-91). The track that had the most done to it, however, was Tama -- it "inspired" two songs featured in two different Hindi films. Ignoring the fact that they had both ripped off the same song, the Laxmikant-Pyarelal (hereafter LP) camp and the Bappi Lahiri camp began the finger-pointing, each accusing the other of having stolen original music from them. LP's version was intended for the Amitabh comeback vehicle Hum (1990-91), and Bappida's track for the Sanjay Dutt starrer Thanedaar (1990). Although the movies were scheduled for release within months of each other, Thanedaar didn't actually hit the box office until much later (1992) because of release date issues complicated by Sanjay Dutt's alleged role as supporting actor in some shady deals with the Bombay underworld. The makers of Hum assumed this resolved the controversy in their favour. With enough time having passed since then, I believe we can revisit the problem without letting our judgment be clouded by all the ancillary details.
In this post, I carefully analyze both songs as well as their accompanying videos before I present my verdict.
The original: Tama by Mory Kanté (Akwaba Beach, 1987) | Jumma Chumma (Hum, 1991) |
Tamma Tamma (Thanedaar, 1990) |
---|---|---|
Category | Jumma Chumma | Tamma Tamma |
---|---|---|
Audio
| ||
Ripoff factor
|
2 points for covering Mory Kanté, regardless of who "originally" copied it. 2 extra points for adding the chorus of Eddy Grant's Gimme Hope, Joanne. (listen starting at 4m56s, for example).
Compare:
[Chumma de] de de chumma... [chumma de] de de chumma de
Gimme hope, Joanna gimme... Gimme hope Joanna till the morning come.
Score: 4 points
|
2 points for covering Mory Kanté, and an extra 2 points to Bappida for trying to justify the controversy thusly: "Lokhikant COPIED my version of the song, [which was] INSPIRED by Mory Kanté." 2 more points to Bappida for including a tiny sample of Yé Ké Yé Ké in his version (This happens during Madhuri's keytar recital, starting around 0m42s . Thanks, Subroto!)
Score: 6 points
|
Lyrics
|
Gets 2 points for rhyming jumma (Friday) with chumma (kiss). Heroine named Jumma -- sometime spelled Zumma in the movie, resulting in confusing lyrics -- is he referring to the heroine, or to the fact that it's a Friday? I could give the movie makers a point or two for thinking, "always build some redundancy into the system", but what eventuality would ever force the movie to forget the Urdu word for Friday, or the word for kiss? I'll give you Tiger, I'll even grant you Kaancha-Cheena, but you lose 1 point for the unnecessarily retarded Jumma. I'm making a point here -- you could have saved some money and hired a stupid monkey with ass herpes to look the word up in an Urdu dictionary in the public library instead of paying some Allahabadi asshole who calls himself a lyricist to come up with this idea. Score: 1 point |
1 point for using part of the original song title. 2 points for pretending tamma tamma refers somehow to making out, 2 points for the following lines of dialogue in the final scene of the movie:
Jaya Prada (very seriously): Yeh Tamma Tamma kya hai?
Jeetendra (just as seriously): Zara kone mein aao, batata hoon.
Jaya Parada (innocently): Achcha, chalo.
3 points for the following lines in the song, and 1 extra point for having Bappida sing them:
Tu premi (aa hah!) main premi (aa hah!)
Tu raazi (aa hah!) main raazi (aa hah!)
Phir kya daddy kya amma
Ek bas tuhi pyar ke kaabil, saara jahaan hai nikamma!
Score: 9 points
|
Vocals
|
Sudesh Bhosle copying Amitabh's on vocals. Congratulations, you just furthered the career of another Bhosle. This one excels at IMITATION, even! What was wrong with having Amitabh sing?
Score: 2 points
|
Bappida on male BHocals. BHocals refers to Bappida-specific Bong effects lent to the song, such as pronouncing the word ek (one) as "A.K."
Score: 5 points
|
Music
|
Superior to Bappida's version, sadly. Although, I think this might just be due to the fact that this camp got way more positive publicity for the song than Bappida ever could, what with Sanjay Dutt on his side. Score: 5 points |
Sorry for the harsh judgment, Bappida. Frankly, I haven't heard this song as often as Jumma Chumma, and while in the process of writing this article, heard it more times than I ever have, and it grew on me. But, original points system says:
Score: 1 point
|
Sound effects
|
Two doo, oooh hanh! Score: 3 points |
Not enough octopad noises in this Bappi tune.
Score: 1 point
|
Backing vocals
|
Good job, works well with the rest of the song, especially during the Gimme Hope, Joanne (Chumma de! De de chumma!) part. Score: 3 points |
I wouldn't miss the backing vocals if they were absent. They're doing nothing special.
Score: 0 points
|
Audio Total
|
18 points
|
22 points
|
Video
|
||
Production/Design
|
Unlike the late 70s or early- and mid-80s, Amitabh's presence alone wasn't enough of a selling point for Hum. They had to make sure to plug and overhype this one song so people would come see the film. Blowing your budget on that one song, therefore, makes fiscal sense. I'm sure they probably did, too. Sadly, I don't see where the money went, other than maybe renting a prison along with inmates, cups and plates, and the most powerful fire hose they could find. I'm pretty sure Kimi Katkar's awful makeup didn't cost more than a few rupees (it was probably being sold by the kilo anyway). For this pathetic attempt, I give this song 1 point. Kimi Katkar's costume gets -2 points. Kimi Katkar's makeup gets -1 points. While trying to make her more appealing by spraying water on her gets them 1 more point, casting Kimi Katkar as the heroine renders this attempt futile, so I'll take away the point I just gave them (-1 point). Thankfully, they didn't go overboard when picking costumes for Amitabh or for his posse. For the aesthetic choice of WHITE, I'll give you people 2 points. Unfortunately, using washing soap instead of beer to overemphasize the foam in everyone's prison mugs loses them street cred, so -1 point for their trouble -- I'm sure that Surf and Hindustan Lever, Ltd. appreciate their business nevertheless. I haven't made up my mind about whether the swing in the middle of the prison was a good thing, so we'll leave it at that. Please don't send me email telling me it wasn't supposed to be a prison scene, I know they all live by the docks, which apparently randomly include a bar[n]. The cups DEFINITELY make it a prison. Score: -1 points |
What is it with Hindi movie song sequences that involve the hero and heroine performing onstage with a band in front of a teenage crowd (said crowd having been hand-picked from outside the nearest college where they happened to be loitering -- it's called a Home Depot, jackass. If you aren't going to study, at least get a job doing real work)? The backing band often consists of fat girls in ponytails and tight shorts that show off their ample thighs, and self-proclaimed sessions musicians (quite often with their faces blackened to make them look African, especially if it's a tribal-themed song) who do a terrible job of syncing their drums/trumpets/guitars to the background music. Worst of all, the fucking fog machine that renders things next to invisible. If you're going to spend a bunch of money on shitty stages and garish lighting, don't you want the audience to at least be able to see said shitty effects? Please fire your overzealous fog machine operator Cheeniya, and accept -5 points for this mess. What were you smoking? You knew you were going up against Amitabh, right?
Madhuri Dixit's costume is not too different from Katkar's (the BLACK theme is evident in both videos), but the wearer also matters. 1980s Madhuri can look innocent in the whoriest of clothes. 3 points.
Sanjay Dutt in a mullet and a moustache. 4 points right there.
What's with the awkward pause in the middle of the song, complete with the "Ey! Khatam ho gaya kya?" followed by a weird out-of-focus close-up of the hero and heroine's eyes? -2 points! Whatever you were going for didn't work. I wish you had followed it up with a Javed Jaffrey-esque, "Ey, khatam nahin hua, chootiye!"
Score: 0 points
|
Choreography
|
The main theme and driving force of this song is the chumma, and you don't really have to put a lot of thought into choreographing it. 5 points for choice of theme that results in ease of flow during song picturization. 2 extra points for the water hose, even though it was used on Kimi Katkar and didn't really do anything to her all-covering black Wild West Whore outfit.
The decision to concentrate on gimmicks instead of choreography (Amitabh flipping a coin to pass the time while the intro music plays, doing stupid stuff with it. What the fuck, did I just travel back in time to when I was seven and forced to go to Apollo Circus? I wasn't entertained by those legerdemain-ing dwarfs back then, and it sure as hell won't amuse me if a seven-foot dwarf tries the same shit without having the decency to wear clown makeup. -3 points. Score: 4 points |
Madhuri Dixit (guided by Saroj Khan, I'm sure) is amazing. Look at the dance moves with her pointy heels. Her face expressionless when it needs to be (gives it the extra I'm-in-Riverdance-but-I-don't-give-a-shit-because-I'm-so-cool feel). 5 points to my dream girl.
Sanjay Dutt doing what looks like the AT-AT Walkers in The Empire Strikes Back do when they... um, walk: 2 extra points.
Shitty backup dancers not walking in line (either that, or they're forming some Illuminati symbols, when viewed from above, that I don't know about): -2 points.
Score: 5 points
|
Star power
|
Definitely one of the best Bachchan movies of the 90s. It was downhill from here on, for most of the 90s. AB's appearance in this song gives it a total of 12 points, 5 for his attendance and 7 for his cooliyat.
Kimi Katkar happened to be available, I guess. 2 points.
|
Madhuri Dixit instantly gets 8 points for her cute self. Dutt gets 2 points.
For the special appearance of a keytar in Madhuri's hands, this video gets 1 extra point.
Score: 11 points
|
Video total
|
10 points |
16 points
|
Total (audio+video)
| 28 points |
38 points
|
I also remember reading in a film magazine that it was thanks to Mukul Anand himself that Bappida became aware of the Mory Kanté song and the fact that LP were in the process of nicking it. Anand and Bappida were apparently reasonably friendly up to that point and had even collaborated on Aitbaar (the movie that was a rip-off of Hitchcock's Dial M for Murder and had Suresh Oberoi singing Kisi Nazar Ko Tera). One day Anand apparently got drunk at a party that Bappida was also attending, and bragged about this new tune that he and LP had heard and were thinking of using in a movie. To Raging Bull Bappi, that was like waving a red gaan[2] ready to be maaroed.
I feel I understand the universe a bit more. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThis is the most insightful thing I have read for years.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI can't believe what i just read. Amazing!
ReplyDeleteROFL
ReplyDeleteCompletely biased... Don't agree with the scoring.. Jooma chumma is much much better...
ReplyDelete